<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PS3 manufacturing cost down 70%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bruceongames.com/2009/07/31/ps3-manufacturing-cost-down-70/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bruceongames.com/2009/07/31/ps3-manufacturing-cost-down-70/</link>
	<description>A veteran's view on marketing games</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:01:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceongames.com/2009/07/31/ps3-manufacturing-cost-down-70/comment-page-1/#comment-5129</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 18:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceongames.com/?p=2301#comment-5129</guid>
		<description>As far as I know Cell started as a 90nm device. Then , via 65nm, it became the current 45nm device and is going to 32nm. Exactly as Moore&#039;s law predicts.

So they are getting four times as many processors for the same size wafer as they were at the beginning. So a Cell now costs 25% of what it did originally. All other things being equal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I know Cell started as a 90nm device. Then , via 65nm, it became the current 45nm device and is going to 32nm. Exactly as Moore&#8217;s law predicts.</p>
<p>So they are getting four times as many processors for the same size wafer as they were at the beginning. So a Cell now costs 25% of what it did originally. All other things being equal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADJB</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceongames.com/2009/07/31/ps3-manufacturing-cost-down-70/comment-page-1/#comment-5128</link>
		<dc:creator>ADJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 17:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceongames.com/?p=2301#comment-5128</guid>
		<description>&quot;Secondly Moores Law reduces semiconductor costs by half every two years.&quot;

The site you quote actually says :-

&quot;Moore&#039;s Law, states that the number of transistors on a chip will double about every two years.&quot;

That doesn&#039;t mean a halving of price, it means a potential doubling of power, far from being the same thing.

Sony won&#039;t gain this advantage because the cell processor hasn&#039;t doubled in transistors in the last two years, its stayed exactly the same.  They may have had some cost reductions by increasing the yield per wafer but this won&#039;t be anything like a 50% price drop.

Most of the cost reduction will be as you say from redesign and sorting out Blu-Ray production, not from chip price reductions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Secondly Moores Law reduces semiconductor costs by half every two years.&#8221;</p>
<p>The site you quote actually says :-</p>
<p>&#8220;Moore&#8217;s Law, states that the number of transistors on a chip will double about every two years.&#8221;</p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t mean a halving of price, it means a potential doubling of power, far from being the same thing.</p>
<p>Sony won&#8217;t gain this advantage because the cell processor hasn&#8217;t doubled in transistors in the last two years, its stayed exactly the same.  They may have had some cost reductions by increasing the yield per wafer but this won&#8217;t be anything like a 50% price drop.</p>
<p>Most of the cost reduction will be as you say from redesign and sorting out Blu-Ray production, not from chip price reductions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

