<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eight news stories 5.6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bruceongames.com/2008/06/05/eight-news-stories-56/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bruceongames.com/2008/06/05/eight-news-stories-56/</link>
	<description>A veteran's view on marketing games</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:01:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceongames.com/2008/06/05/eight-news-stories-56/comment-page-1/#comment-2394</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceongames.com/?p=561#comment-2394</guid>
		<description>I agree that Harrison is wrong.  AI is really the sea change battleground of future gaming.  I suspect that, within the next decade, single-player games will be populated with such compelling AI characters that the lure of online connectivity (for gameplay purposes, at least) will be greatly reduced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Harrison is wrong.  AI is really the sea change battleground of future gaming.  I suspect that, within the next decade, single-player games will be populated with such compelling AI characters that the lure of online connectivity (for gameplay purposes, at least) will be greatly reduced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian May</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceongames.com/2008/06/05/eight-news-stories-56/comment-page-1/#comment-2389</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 20:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceongames.com/?p=561#comment-2389</guid>
		<description>Of course Phil is wrong.  Phil is nearly always wrong.

What people might finally realise with Phil is that being extremely good at standing in front of a crowd and presenting has very little in common with knowing what you&#039;re talking about.  The credibility you may get from standing in front of one of the world&#039;s great electronics companies is kind of gone when it&#039;s just you and David Gardner standing in front of a business even Bruno Bonnell gave up on.

No sooner is he out of the door than SCE is canning his projects.  Did his &#039;largest studio operation in the world&#039; ever do anything good other than Singstar?

Bye Phil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course Phil is wrong.  Phil is nearly always wrong.</p>
<p>What people might finally realise with Phil is that being extremely good at standing in front of a crowd and presenting has very little in common with knowing what you&#8217;re talking about.  The credibility you may get from standing in front of one of the world&#8217;s great electronics companies is kind of gone when it&#8217;s just you and David Gardner standing in front of a business even Bruno Bonnell gave up on.</p>
<p>No sooner is he out of the door than SCE is canning his projects.  Did his &#8216;largest studio operation in the world&#8217; ever do anything good other than Singstar?</p>
<p>Bye Phil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

