<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eight news stories 10.4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bruceongames.com/2008/04/10/eight-news-stories-104/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bruceongames.com/2008/04/10/eight-news-stories-104/</link>
	<description>A veteran's view on marketing games</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:56:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rincewind</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceongames.com/2008/04/10/eight-news-stories-104/comment-page-1/#comment-1481</link>
		<dc:creator>Rincewind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceongames.com/2008/04/10/eight-news-stories-104/#comment-1481</guid>
		<description>I agree with most of what Lloyd said. I also have something to add.

We have to choose our side between quality and quantity, here. Nintendo helped develop the &quot;casual&quot; mass market, that&#039;s for sure. But if there hadn&#039;t been people like Peter Molyneux (or Shigeru Miyamoto, or Hideo Kojima, or Eric Chailly, ...), this medium would not have grown into something that we today can call &quot;art&quot;. So IMO, and if talking from a &quot;quality&quot; point of view, people like Peter Molyneux do not hold the industry back. On the opposite, they precisely move it forward.

I think we should sometimes forget about facts and figures and ask ourselves what we want this industry to become...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with most of what Lloyd said. I also have something to add.</p>
<p>We have to choose our side between quality and quantity, here. Nintendo helped develop the &#8220;casual&#8221; mass market, that&#8217;s for sure. But if there hadn&#8217;t been people like Peter Molyneux (or Shigeru Miyamoto, or Hideo Kojima, or Eric Chailly, &#8230;), this medium would not have grown into something that we today can call &#8220;art&#8221;. So IMO, and if talking from a &#8220;quality&#8221; point of view, people like Peter Molyneux do not hold the industry back. On the opposite, they precisely move it forward.</p>
<p>I think we should sometimes forget about facts and figures and ask ourselves what we want this industry to become&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceongames.com/2008/04/10/eight-news-stories-104/comment-page-1/#comment-1479</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceongames.com/2008/04/10/eight-news-stories-104/#comment-1479</guid>
		<description>Bruce you are AGAIN interpreting figures how you want. The article you link to referring to claims that &quot;72% of Americans have played a videogame&quot;. That basically equates to people who have tried games a minimum of 1 times. This could possibly include years ago down the pizza parlour on a pac man arcade cabinet.

It DOES NOT mean 72% of America are gamers. I remember reading an article on the escapist a while back by a female gamer who lives in the states, and is still ostracized by family members, work colleagues and parental types because she is a gamer. 
      Now, if 72% of Americans are gamers , as your exaggerated estimation claims, I don&#039;t think such social stigma and media stereotyping  of games would still exist, do you?

This echoes the time where you widely exaggerated the figures in regards to Habbo Hotel&#039;s userbase and I called you out on it.

I&#039;m not a massive fan of Molyneux&#039;s tendancy to hype his own works, and I havn&#039;t had any experience of his games except for ThemePark (Bullfrog produced this, not sure of his extent of involvement with it to be fair), but I know a few of ex-gamers and casual types who have spoke to me about their fondness of Theme Park, Populus and Theme Hospital, so to say he caters to the &#039;hardcore niche&#039; is a little misguided, especially with regards to his ambitions with Fable 2.
   To give him his dues he speaketh truth in that article. I have to agree that Gaming hasn&#039;t grown as exponentially as it could have. Bruce, do you happen to have any anecdotal evidence to back up your claims of him &#039;speaking rubbish&#039; without falling back on your old trick of over-optimistic appraisals of statistics, possibly the least exact science in the world ?
Or perhaps, it might be yourself, as the kids like to say, &quot;chatting breeze,blood&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce you are AGAIN interpreting figures how you want. The article you link to referring to claims that &#8220;72% of Americans have played a videogame&#8221;. That basically equates to people who have tried games a minimum of 1 times. This could possibly include years ago down the pizza parlour on a pac man arcade cabinet.</p>
<p>It DOES NOT mean 72% of America are gamers. I remember reading an article on the escapist a while back by a female gamer who lives in the states, and is still ostracized by family members, work colleagues and parental types because she is a gamer.<br />
      Now, if 72% of Americans are gamers , as your exaggerated estimation claims, I don&#8217;t think such social stigma and media stereotyping  of games would still exist, do you?</p>
<p>This echoes the time where you widely exaggerated the figures in regards to Habbo Hotel&#8217;s userbase and I called you out on it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a massive fan of Molyneux&#8217;s tendancy to hype his own works, and I havn&#8217;t had any experience of his games except for ThemePark (Bullfrog produced this, not sure of his extent of involvement with it to be fair), but I know a few of ex-gamers and casual types who have spoke to me about their fondness of Theme Park, Populus and Theme Hospital, so to say he caters to the &#8216;hardcore niche&#8217; is a little misguided, especially with regards to his ambitions with Fable 2.<br />
   To give him his dues he speaketh truth in that article. I have to agree that Gaming hasn&#8217;t grown as exponentially as it could have. Bruce, do you happen to have any anecdotal evidence to back up your claims of him &#8217;speaking rubbish&#8217; without falling back on your old trick of over-optimistic appraisals of statistics, possibly the least exact science in the world ?<br />
Or perhaps, it might be yourself, as the kids like to say, &#8220;chatting breeze,blood&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
