<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A free marketing tip for Jagex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bruceongames.com/2008/03/03/a-free-marketing-tip-for-jagex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bruceongames.com/2008/03/03/a-free-marketing-tip-for-jagex/</link>
	<description>A veteran's view on marketing games</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:53:25 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: yg</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceongames.com/2008/03/03/a-free-marketing-tip-for-jagex/comment-page-1/#comment-1182</link>
		<dc:creator>yg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceongames.com/2008/03/03/a-free-marketing-tip-for-jagex/#comment-1182</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t such a move, although being a good PR stunt, endorse the link between player&#039;s actions in a game (based in a fantasy world) and the real world. Isn&#039;t that what polititians do when they talk about violence in games? Basically anyone that you argue against will bring this up as prejudice: &quot;good stuff - we can make the link, bad stuff - we cant&quot;. I admit it would be an excellent PR move if executed properly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t such a move, although being a good PR stunt, endorse the link between player&#8217;s actions in a game (based in a fantasy world) and the real world. Isn&#8217;t that what polititians do when they talk about violence in games? Basically anyone that you argue against will bring this up as prejudice: &#8220;good stuff &#8211; we can make the link, bad stuff &#8211; we cant&#8221;. I admit it would be an excellent PR move if executed properly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
