<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Publisher consolidation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bruceongames.com/2007/08/08/publisher-consolidation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bruceongames.com/2007/08/08/publisher-consolidation/</link>
	<description>A veteran's view on marketing games</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:32:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceongames.com/2007/08/08/publisher-consolidation/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceongames.com/2007/08/08/publisher-consolidation/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>If there are just 2 or three independent publishers then , on current form, none of them are going to be from the UK. They probably don&#039;t have the management horsepower to put the deals together. Ubi could have been the European champion till EA took such a big stake. They are by far the best managed European publisher.

When I was at Codemasters I suggested that we formed a strategic alliance with an American publisher that was weak in Europe. Thus creating some nice synergies. This was discussed but never acted on due mainly to short termism. My idea was to then form a three way alliance with a Japanese publisher with possible eventual equity swops to create a global player in simple, easy stages.

We should see more consolidation this cycle as those who are not truly global find it more difficult to compete at the much higher level of development costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there are just 2 or three independent publishers then , on current form, none of them are going to be from the UK. They probably don&#8217;t have the management horsepower to put the deals together. Ubi could have been the European champion till EA took such a big stake. They are by far the best managed European publisher.</p>
<p>When I was at Codemasters I suggested that we formed a strategic alliance with an American publisher that was weak in Europe. Thus creating some nice synergies. This was discussed but never acted on due mainly to short termism. My idea was to then form a three way alliance with a Japanese publisher with possible eventual equity swops to create a global player in simple, easy stages.</p>
<p>We should see more consolidation this cycle as those who are not truly global find it more difficult to compete at the much higher level of development costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceongames.com/2007/08/08/publisher-consolidation/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceongames.com/2007/08/08/publisher-consolidation/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>I think this is true however it seems a little slow at the moment - companies like atari and Midway dont have a lot of hot IP and have been near takeover a few too many times. Do you believe that publishers will take a much bigger step in this direction during this new cycle than previously? And also - do you think the Uk will be able to compete with other EU or Us companies? It  seems Sci and Codemasters have found it tough albeit with their recent restructures and re-directing strategies....?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is true however it seems a little slow at the moment &#8211; companies like atari and Midway dont have a lot of hot IP and have been near takeover a few too many times. Do you believe that publishers will take a much bigger step in this direction during this new cycle than previously? And also &#8211; do you think the Uk will be able to compete with other EU or Us companies? It  seems Sci and Codemasters have found it tough albeit with their recent restructures and re-directing strategies&#8230;.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tadhg</title>
		<link>http://www.bruceongames.com/2007/08/08/publisher-consolidation/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Tadhg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 16:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bruceongames.com/2007/08/08/publisher-consolidation/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think your sentiment is wrong, but there is another potential scenario. 

Though apparently easy to dismiss, I would not rule out the manufacturers as being &quot;the sum of one publisher&quot; because if you look at the economics of it, a manufacturer-publisher is far more profitable and efficient in the current industry than any third party. They make more out of their development and more out of their sales, and all three have deep pockets.

In that vein, I can easily see a scenario in 5 or so years&#039; time where there simply are no third parties at all. If the pressures on third parties continue to squeeze as they have done during this decade, it is entirely conceivable that all of the major third parties will themselves be purchased, including EA, by larger companies than themselves in key territories.

The easy split of that would be that the US publishers would come under Microsoft&#039;s wing, while the Japanese ones would come under Sony&#039;s, and Nintendo would keep themselves above the fray. In reality, it could just as easily be that Microsoft acquire Square, while Sony acquire Activision, but who can say.

Vertical integration and format consolidation is very much where the industry is pitching its tent because that&#039;s where the power is. The eventual natural outcome of that is that all third  parties get melted in the fullness of time to the great Cthulhu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think your sentiment is wrong, but there is another potential scenario. </p>
<p>Though apparently easy to dismiss, I would not rule out the manufacturers as being &#8220;the sum of one publisher&#8221; because if you look at the economics of it, a manufacturer-publisher is far more profitable and efficient in the current industry than any third party. They make more out of their development and more out of their sales, and all three have deep pockets.</p>
<p>In that vein, I can easily see a scenario in 5 or so years&#8217; time where there simply are no third parties at all. If the pressures on third parties continue to squeeze as they have done during this decade, it is entirely conceivable that all of the major third parties will themselves be purchased, including EA, by larger companies than themselves in key territories.</p>
<p>The easy split of that would be that the US publishers would come under Microsoft&#8217;s wing, while the Japanese ones would come under Sony&#8217;s, and Nintendo would keep themselves above the fray. In reality, it could just as easily be that Microsoft acquire Square, while Sony acquire Activision, but who can say.</p>
<p>Vertical integration and format consolidation is very much where the industry is pitching its tent because that&#8217;s where the power is. The eventual natural outcome of that is that all third  parties get melted in the fullness of time to the great Cthulhu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
